(Circulation. 1999;100:768-771.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
Is 8-mm More Effective Than 4-mm Tip Electrode Catheter for Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter?
Presented at the 71st Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Dallas, Tex, November 8–11, 1998, and published in abstract form (Circulation. 1998;98[suppl 1]: I-19.)
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, and Veterans General Hospital-Taipei and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical and Dental College Hospital (C.-F.T.), Taiwan, R.O.C.
Correspondence to Shih-Ann Chen, MD, Division of Cardiology, Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, 201, Sec 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. E-mail sachen{at}vghtpe.gov.tw
Background—The prospective, randomized study comparing 4- with 8-mm tip electrodes for radiofrequency linear ablation of typical atrial flutter is not available.
Methods and Results—A total of 104 consecutive patients with typical atrial flutter were randomly assigned to undergo radiofrequency linear ablation using a 4- (Group I, n=54) or 8-mm tip electrode (Group II, n=50) catheter (temperature-control model, preset 70°C). If complete bidirectional isthmus block could not be achieved after 5 pulses, the ablation catheter was changed to the other type; the maximal radiofrequency pulse number was limited to <10 pulses. Complete or incomplete isthmus conduction block was assessed by activation sequence in a multielectrode Halo catheter during low lateral right atrial and proximal coronary sinus pacing. Before shifting to the other catheter type, the 8-mm electrode catheter achieved higher complete isthmus block rate (92% versus 67%, P<0.05) with fewer pulses (2±1 versus 3±1, P<0.05), shorter procedure time (24±15 versus 31±12 minutes, P<0.05), and shorter fluoroscopic time (14±10 versus 23±15 minutes, P<0.05). After 5 failed ablation pulses, 12 (67%) of 18 patients in group I attained complete isthmus block by using an 8-mm tip catheter, but none of 4 patients in group II achieved complete block by changing to a 4-mm tip catheter.
Conclusions—The 8-mm tip electrodes are more effective than the standard 4-mm length electrodes in linear ablation for typical atrial flutter. This clinical benefit may be of particular value for some patients with broad and/or thick isthmus.
Key Words: atrial flutter • ablation • isthmus
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. E. Eckart and L. M. Epstein Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1357 - 1374. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Marine Catheter Ablation Therapy for Supraventricular Arrhythmias JAMA, December 19, 2007; 298(23): 2768 - 2778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Calkins, J. Brugada, D. L. Packer, R. Cappato, S.-A. Chen, H. J.G. Crijns, R. J. Damiano Jr, D. W. Davies, D. E. Haines, M. Haissaguerre, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and Approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 335 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F G Cosio Should ablation be the first line treatment for supraventricular arrhythmias? Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 5 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Hillock, I. C. Melton, and I. G. Crozier Radiofrequency ablation for common atrial flutter using an 8-mm tip catheter and up to 150 W Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(5): 409 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Da Costa, E. Faure, J. Thevenin, M. Messier, S. Bernard, K. Abdel, C. Robin, C. Romeyer, and K. Isaaz Effect of Isthmus Anatomy and Ablation Catheter on Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the Cavotricuspid Isthmus Circulation, August 31, 2004; 110(9): 1030 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Scavee, P. Jais, L.-F. Hsu, P. Sanders, M. Hocini, R. Weerasooriya, L. Macle, F. Raybaud, J. Clementy, and M. Haissaguerre Prospective randomised comparison of irrigated-tip and large-tip catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2004; 25(11): 963 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Feld, M. Wharton, V. Plumb, E. Daoud, T. Friehling, L. Epstein, and EPT-1000 XP Cardiac Ablation System Investigators Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter using large-tip 8- or 10-mm electrode catheters and a high-output radiofrequency energy generator: Results of a multicenter safety and efficacy study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1466 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. D. Satti and L. M. Epstein Cardiologic Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1253 - 1270. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Stabile, A. De Simone, P. Turco, V. La Rocca, P. Nocerino, C. Astarita, F. Maresca, C. De Matteis, T. Di Napoli, E. Stabile, et al. Response to flecainide infusion predicts long-term success of hybrid pharmacologic and ablation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2001; 37(6): 1639 - 1644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Kottkamp, B. Hugl, B. Krauss, U. Wetzel, A. Fleck, G. Schuler, and G. Hindricks Electromagnetic Versus Fluoroscopic Mapping of the Inferior Isthmus for Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter : A Prospective Randomized Study Circulation, October 24, 2000; 102(17): 2082 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|