| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on March 10, 2009
From the Department of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, Athens, Greece. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: spargias{at}ocsc.gr.
Background—The prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy, which accounts for considerable morbidity and mortality, remains a vexing problem. Contrast-induced renal vasoconstriction is believed to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of contrast-induced nephropathy. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of the prostacyclin analog iloprost in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing a coronary procedure. Methods and Results—We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of iloprost in 208 patients with a serum creatinine concentration Conclusion—Prophylactic administration of iloprost may protect against contrast-induced nephropathy in high-risk patients undergoing a coronary procedure.
Accepted on August 7, 2009
Iloprost Prevents Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Intervention
Konstantinos Spargias MD*,
1.4 mg/dL who underwent coronary angiography and/or intervention. Iloprost 1 ng · kg-1 · min-1 or placebo was administered intravenously beginning 30 to 90 minutes before and ending 4 hours after the procedure. Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined by an absolute increase in serum creatinine
0.5 mg/dL or a relative increase
25% measured 2 to 5 days after the procedure. Contrast-induced nephropathy occurred in 23 of the 105 patients (22%) in the control group and in 8 of the 103 patients (8%) in the iloprost group (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.69; P=0.005). In the control group, the estimated glomerular filtration rate declined from 49.7±15.5 to 46.6±16.6 mL · min-1 · 1.73 m-2 (P=0.01). In the iloprost group, the estimated glomerular filtration rate increased marginally from 47.5±14.5 to 48.6±16.1 mL · min-1 · 1.73 m-2 (P=0.26). The mean absolute estimated glomerular filtration rate decline in the control group was greater than its change in the iloprost group (difference, 4.2 mL · min-1 · 1.73 m-2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 7.3; P=0.008).
Related Articles:
Circulation 2009 120: 1743-1744.
Circulation 2009 120: 1749-1751.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. McCullough and J. A. Tumlin Prostaglandin-Based Renal Protection Against Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Circulation, November 3, 2009; 120(18): 1749 - 1751. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |